Parallel XPBD Simulation of Modified Morse Potential - an Alternative Spring Model (Unknown language)

How to get this document?

Download
Commercial Copyright fee: €14.50 Basic fee: €4.00 Total price: €18.50
Academic Copyright fee: €4.50 Basic fee: €2.00 Total price: €6.50

In this paper, we introduce a modified Morse potential as an alternative to the existing spring models within a massively parallel extended Position Based Dynamics (XPBD) algorithm. To date, stretching is one of the most popular constraint types of XPBD frameworks due to its simplicity, robustness and efficiency. However, the underneath mathematical expression of stretching constraint does not fully represent a spring model and behaves too stiff over a certain iteration count or damping coefficient. On the other hand, Hookean spring potential behaves softer and viscoelastic within the XPBD algorithm under the same conditions as stretching constraint. Our modified Morse potential addresses this issue by keeping the simulation of deformable models in between Hooke's law and stretching constraint. To demonstrate the benefits of modified Morse potential with higher frame rates, we develop an efficient Independent Edge Grouping algorithm for XPBD method which provides parallel processing on GPU. We compare the simulation results of cloth and volumetric models with stretching constraint, Hookean and St. Venant-Kirchhoff (STVK) spring potentials. We believe that our modified Morse potential is easy to implement and seamlessly fit into the existing XPBD frameworks.

Table of contents conference proceedings

The tables of contents are generated automatically and are based on the data records of the individual contributions available in the index of the TIB portal. The display of the Tables of Contents may therefore be incomplete.

1
Dynamic I/O Budget Reallocation For In Situ Wavelet Compression
Marsaglia, Nicole J. / Li, Shaomeng / Belcher, Kristi / Larsen, Matthew / Childs, Hank | 2019
7
Fast Mesh Validation in Combustion Simulations through In-Situ Visualization
Shudler, Sergei / Ferrier, Nicola / Insley, Joseph / Papka, Michael E. / Patel, Saumil / Rizzi, Silvio | 2019
17
Scalable Parallel Flow Visualization Using 3D Line Integral Convolution for Large Scale Unstructured Simulation Data
Liao, Yangguang / Matsui, Hiroaki / Kreylos, Oliver / Kellogg, Louise H. | 2019
27
Task-based Augmented Reeb Graphs with Dynamic ST-Trees
Gueunet, Charles / Fortin, Pierre / Jomier, Julien / Tierny, Julien | 2019
39
Parallel XPBD Simulation of Modified Morse Potential - an Alternative Spring Model
Cetinaslan, Ozan | 2019
49
Real-time Particle-based Snow Simulation on the GPU
Goswami, Prashant / Markowicz, Christian / Hassan, Ali | 2019
59
Hybrid Online Autotuning for Parallel Ray Tracing
Herveau, Killian / Pfaffe, Philip / Tillmann, Martin Peter / Tichy, Walter F. / Dachsbacher, Carsten | 2019
69
Screen Partitioning Load Balancing for Parallel Rendering on a Multi-GPU Multi-Display Workstation
Dong, Yangzi / Peng, Chao | 2019
79
Efficient Point Merging Using Data Parallel Techniques
Yenpure, Abhishek / Childs, Hank / Moreland, Kenneth | 2019
89
Hybrid Remote Visualization in Immersive Virtual Environments with Vistle
Aumüller, Martin | 2019
101
Statistical Analysis of Parallel Data Uploading using OpenGL
Wiedemann, Markus / Kranzlmüller, Dieter | 2019
109
An Interpolation Scheme for VDVP Lagrangian Basis Flows
Sane, Sudhanshu / Childs, Hank / Bujack, Roxana | 2019