The European Competition Law Enforcement System and the Evolution of Judicial Review (Englisch)
- Neue Suche nach: Schweitzer, H.
- Neue Suche nach: Schweitzer, H.
- Neue Suche nach: Ehlermann, C.-D.
- Neue Suche nach: Marquis, M.
In:
EU Competition Law and Policy Workshop; the evaluation of evidence and its judicial review in competition cases
;
79
;
2011
-
ISBN:
- Aufsatz (Konferenz) / Print
-
Titel:The European Competition Law Enforcement System and the Evolution of Judicial Review
-
Beteiligte:
-
Kongress:14th, EU Competition Law and Policy Workshop; the evaluation of evidence and its judicial review in competition cases ; 2009 ; Florence, Italy
-
Erschienen in:
-
Verlag:
- Neue Suche nach: Hart
-
Erscheinungsort:Oxford
-
Erscheinungsdatum:01.01.2011
-
Format / Umfang:79 pages
-
Anmerkungen:Includes bibliographical references and index
-
ISBN:
-
Medientyp:Aufsatz (Konferenz)
-
Format:Print
-
Sprache:Englisch
-
Schlagwörter:
-
Datenquelle:
© Metadata Copyright the British Library Board and other contributors. All rights reserved.
Inhaltsverzeichnis Konferenzband
Die Inhaltsverzeichnisse werden automatisch erzeugt und basieren auf den im Index des TIB-Portals verfügbaren Einzelnachweisen der enthaltenen Beiträge. Die Anzeige der Inhaltsverzeichnisse kann daher unvollständig oder lückenhaft sein.
- 61
-
The European Competition System in Context: Matching Old Constitutional Principles and New Policy ChallengesLasserre, B. et al. | 2011
- 79
-
The European Competition Law Enforcement System and the Evolution of Judicial ReviewSchweitzer, H. et al. | 2011
- 147
-
A Uniform Standard of Proof in EU Competition ProceedingsHellstrom, P. et al. | 2011
- 157
-
Taking Sound Decisions on the Basis of Available EvidenceLowe, P. et al. | 2011
- 175
-
Standards of Proof and Personal Conviction in EU Antitrust and Merger Control ProceduresBlanco, L.O. et al. | 2011
- 191
-
Human All Too Human: The Gathering and Assessment of Evidence and the Appropriate Standard of Proof and Judicial Review in Commission Enforcement Proceedings Applying Articles 81 and 82Venit, J. et al. | 2011
- 255
-
The Commission's ``More Economic Approach'' - Implications for the Role of the EU Courts, the Treatment of Economic Evidence and the Scope of Judicial ReviewForwood, N. et al. | 2011
- 271
-
Standard of Proof, Burden of Proof, Standards of Review and Evaluation of Evidence in Antitrust and Merger Cases: Perspective of Court of Justice of the European UnionCaoimh, A.O. et al. | 2011
- 285
-
Standard of Review - Comprehensive or Limited?Wahl, N. et al. | 2011
- 295
-
The Elusive Standard of Proof in EU Competition CasesGippini-Fournier, E. et al. | 2011
- 319
-
Evidence, Proof and Judicial Review in Cartel Casesde la Torre, F.C. et al. | 2011
- 407
-
A Bush in Need of Pruning: the Luxuriant Growth of ``Light Judicial Review''Forrester, I. et al. | 2011
- 453
-
Judicial Review in EC competition cases before the European Courts: Avoiding double renvoiRatliff, J. et al. | 2011
- 473
-
The Use of Economic Evidence before the Courts of the European UnionCoombs, J. / Padilla, J. et al. | 2011
- 513
-
The Legal Significance of Economic Evidence in Antitrust Cases: Some Comments Based on the Italian ExperienceHeimler, A. et al. | 2011
- 533
-
Standard of Proof, Burden of Proof and Evaluation of Evidence in Antitrust and Merger Cases: A Perspective of the Netherlands Competition AuthorityKalbfleisch, P. et al. | 2011
- 549
-
Rules of Evidence in Competition Cases: An NCA PerspectiveSteenbergen, J. et al. | 2011
- 557
-
Observations on Evidentiary Issues in Antitrust CasesRosch, J.T. et al. | 2011
- 565
-
Evidence Gathered through Leniency: From the Prisoner's Dilemma to a Race to the BottomAllendesalazar, R. / Lage, P.M. et al. | 2011
- 579
-
Antitrust and Merger Cases in Italy: Standard of Proof, Burden of Proof and Evaluation of EvidenceSiragusa, M. et al. | 2011
- 601
-
Evidence in Judicial Review of U.S. Federal Trade Commission and U.S. Department of Justice Merger CasesRill, J. / Lederman, J. et al. | 2011
- 611
-
How Should Economic Evidence be Presented and Evaluated?Carlton, D. et al. | 2011
- 623
-
National courts in major jurisdictions: Standard of proof, burden of proof, standards of review and evaluation of evidence in antitrust and merger cases| 2011
- 653
-
Evidence in Competition Cases: An American Trial Judge's PerspectiveWalker, V. et al. | 2011
- 665
-
Evidence and the Formulation of U.S. Antitrust LawBoudin, M. et al. | 2011
- 671
-
Standard of Proof, Standards of Review and Evaluation of Evidence in UK Antitrust and Merger CasesBacon, K. et al. | 2011
- 683
-
Evaluation of Evidence in National Courts: Reflections from the German PerspectiveBurrichter, J. / Logemann, H. et al. | 2011
- 697
-
A Canadian Perspective on the Evaluation of Evidence in Antitrust and Merger Cases in the Context of Recent Changes to Canada's Competition LawGoldman, C. / Kwinter, R. / Joneja, N. / Leddy, C. et al. | 2011
- 713
-
Separating the Wheat from the Chaff: How the U.S. Courts Analyze Antitrust EvidenceHawk, B. / Keyte, J. et al. | 2011
- xv
-
Introduction - Rules That Govern Rules: Evidence, Proof and Judicial Control in Competition CasesMarquis, M. et al. | 2011