From the theoretical to the practical: how to evaluate the ethical and scientific justifications of randomized clinical trials (Unbekannt)
- Neue Suche nach: Olsen, Maria
- Neue Suche nach: Sharp, Melissa K.
- Neue Suche nach: Bossuyt, Patrick M.
- Neue Suche nach: Olsen, Maria
- Neue Suche nach: Sharp, Melissa K.
- Neue Suche nach: Bossuyt, Patrick M.
In:
Journal of clinical epidemiology
;
99
;
170-171
;
2018
-
ISSN:
- Aufsatz (Zeitschrift) / Print
-
Titel:From the theoretical to the practical: how to evaluate the ethical and scientific justifications of randomized clinical trials
-
Beteiligte:
-
Erschienen in:Journal of clinical epidemiology ; 99 ; 170-171
-
Verlag:
- Neue Suche nach: Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam.
-
Erscheinungsdatum:01.01.2018
-
Format / Umfang:2 pages
-
ISSN:
-
Medientyp:Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
-
Format:Print
-
Sprache:Unbekannt
-
Datenquelle:
© Metadata Copyright the British Library Board and other contributors. All rights reserved.
Inhaltsverzeichnis – Band 99
Zeige alle Jahrgänge und Ausgaben
Die Inhaltsverzeichnisse werden automatisch erzeugt und basieren auf den im Index des TIB-Portals verfügbaren Einzelnachweisen der enthaltenen Beiträge. Die Anzeige der Inhaltsverzeichnisse kann daher unvollständig oder lückenhaft sein.
- 1
-
Most response-inducing strategies do not increase participation in observational studies: a systematic review and meta-analysisvan Gelder, Marleen M.H.J. / Vlenterie, Richelle / IntHout, Joanna / Engelen, Lucien J.L.P.G. / Vrieling, Alina / van de Belt, Tom H. et al. | 2018
- 14
-
Systematic reviews do not adequately report or address missing outcome data in their analyses: a methodological surveyKahale, Lara A. / Diab, Batoul / Brignardello-Petersen, Romina / Agarwal, Arnav / Mustafa, Reem A. / Kwong, Joey / Neumann, Ignacio / Li, Ling / Lopes, Luciane Cruz / Briel, Matthias et al. | 2018
- 24
-
Quality assessment versus risk of bias in systematic reviews: AMSTAR and ROBIS had similar reliability but differed in their construct and applicabilityBanzi, Rita / Cinquini, Michela / Gonzalez-Lorenzo, Marien / Pecoraro, Valentina / Capobussi, Matteo / Minozzi, Silvia et al. | 2018
- 33
-
Do clinicians want recommendations? A multicenter study comparing evidence summaries with and without GRADE recommendationsNeumann, Ignacio / Alonso-Coello, Pablo / Vandvik, Per Olav / Agoritsas, Thomas / Mas, Gemma / Akl, Elie A. / Brignardello-Petersen, Romina / Emparanza, Jose / McCullagh, Lauren / De Sitio, Catherine et al. | 2018
- 41
-
Structured methodology review identified seven (RETREAT) criteria for selecting qualitative evidence synthesis approachesBooth, Andrew / Noyes, Jane / Flemming, Kate / Gerhardus, Ansgar / Wahlster, Philip / van der Wilt, Gert Jan / Mozygemba, Kati / Refolo, Pietro / Sacchini, Dario / Tummers, Marcia et al. | 2018
- 53
-
Systematic review identifies six metrics and one method for assessing literature search effectiveness but no consensus on appropriate useCooper, Chris / Varley-Campbell, Joanna / Booth, Andrew / Britten, Nicky / Garside, Ruth et al. | 2018
- 64
-
Network meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies identifies and ranks the optimal diagnostic tests and thresholds for health care policy and decision-makingOwen, Rhiannon K. / Cooper, Nicola J. / Quinn, Terence J. / Lees, Rosalind / Sutton, Alex J. et al. | 2018
- 75
-
An observational study showed that explaining randomization using gambling-related metaphors and computer-agency descriptions impeded randomized clinical trial recruitmentJepson, Marcus / Elliott, Daisy / Conefrey, Carmel / Wade, Julia / Rooshenas, Leila / Wilson, Caroline / Beard, David / Blazeby, Jane M. / Birtle, Alison / Halliday, Alison et al. | 2018
- 84
-
Association measures of claims-based algorithms for common chronic conditions were assessed using regularly collected data in JapanHara, Konan / Tomio, Jun / Svensson, Thomas / Ohkuma, Rika / Svensson, Akiko Kishi / Yamazaki, Tsutomu et al. | 2018
- 96
-
Lack of preregistered analysis plans allows unacceptable data mining for and selective reporting of consensus in Delphi studiesGrant, Sean / Booth, Marika / Khodyakov, Dmitry et al. | 2018
- 106
-
A review of cluster randomized trials found statistical evidence of selection biasBolzern, Jaime / Mnyama, Nandi / Bosanquet, Katharine / Torgerson, David J. et al. | 2018
- 113
-
Cross-cultural adaptation of Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire needs to assess the measurement properties: a systematic reviewYao, Min / Zhu, Sen / Tian, Zi-rui / Song, Yong-jia / Yang, Long / Wang, Yong-jun / Cui, Xue-jun et al. | 2018
- 123
-
PRISMA and AMSTAR show systematic reviews on health literacy and cancer screening are of good qualitySharma, Sakshi / Oremus, Mark et al. | 2018
- 132
-
High agreement was obtained across scores from multiple equated scales for social anxiety disorder using item response theorySunderland, Matthew / Batterham, Philip / Calear, Alison / Carragher, Natacha / Baillie, Andrew / Slade, Tim et al. | 2018
- 144
-
The M3 multimorbidity index outperformed both Charlson and Elixhauser indices when predicting adverse outcomes in people with diabetesGurney, Jason K. / Stanley, James / Sarfati, Diana et al. | 2018
- 153
-
Extraction of unadjusted estimates of prognostic association for meta-analysis: simulation methods as good alternatives to trend and direct method estimationPérez, T. / McLellan, J. / Perera, R. et al. | 2018
- 164
-
Pragmatic trials revisited: applicability is about individualizationSacristán, José A. / Dilla, Tatiana et al. | 2018
- 167
-
Preregistration and publication of nonregulated intervention trials are here to stay (letter commenting Wallach et al 2018, 93, 88-93)Dal-Ré, Rafael et al. | 2018
- 168
-
Technology-assisted risk of bias assessment in systematic reviews requires precise definitions of risk of biasPuljak, Livia et al. | 2018
- 169
-
Response to Dr. Livia Puljak's letter about our published articleGates, Allison / Vandermeer, Ben / Hartling, Lisa et al. | 2018
- 170
-
From the theoretical to the practical: how to evaluate the ethical and scientific justifications of randomized clinical trialsOlsen, Maria / Sharp, Melissa K. / Bossuyt, Patrick M. et al. | 2018
- 171
-
Reply to: Letter to the Editor by M. Olsen, M. K. Sharp, and P. M. BossuytShamy, Michel / Fedyk, Mark et al. | 2018
- iii
-
Table of Contents| 2018
- vi
-
The need for consensus on consensus methodsTugwell, Peter / Knottnerus, J. André et al. | 2018
-
Cover 2 Editorial Board| 2018