Limitations of P-Values and R-squared for Stepwise Regression Building: A Fairness Demonstration in Health Policy Risk Adjustment (Englisch)
Freier Zugriff
- Neue Suche nach: Rose, Sherri
- Neue Suche nach: McGuire, Thomas G.
- Neue Suche nach: Rose, Sherri
- Neue Suche nach: McGuire, Thomas G.
In:
The American Statistician
;
73
, sup1
;
152-156
;
2019
- Aufsatz (Zeitschrift) / Elektronische Ressource
-
Titel:Limitations of P-Values and R-squared for Stepwise Regression Building: A Fairness Demonstration in Health Policy Risk Adjustment
-
Beteiligte:Rose, Sherri ( Autor:in ) / McGuire, Thomas G. ( Autor:in )
-
Erschienen in:The American Statistician ; 73, sup1 ; 152-156
-
Verlag:
- Neue Suche nach: Taylor & Francis
-
Erscheinungsdatum:29.03.2019
-
Format / Umfang:5 pages
-
ISSN:
-
DOI:
-
Medientyp:Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
-
Format:Elektronische Ressource
-
Sprache:Englisch
-
Schlagwörter:
-
Datenquelle:
Inhaltsverzeichnis – Band 73, Ausgabe sup1
Zeige alle Jahrgänge und Ausgaben
Die Inhaltsverzeichnisse werden automatisch erzeugt und basieren auf den im Index des TIB-Portals verfügbaren Einzelnachweisen der enthaltenen Beiträge. Die Anzeige der Inhaltsverzeichnisse kann daher unvollständig oder lückenhaft sein.
- 1
-
Moving to a World Beyond “p < 0.05”Wasserstein, Ronald L. / Schirm, Allen L. / Lazar, Nicole A. et al. | 2019
- 20
-
What Have We (Not) Learnt from Millions of Scientific Papers with P Values?Ioannidis, John P. A. et al. | 2019
- 26
-
Why is Getting Rid of P-Values So Hard? Musings on Science and StatisticsGoodman, Steven N. et al. | 2019
- 31
-
Will the ASA's Efforts to Improve Statistical Practice be Successful? Some Evidence to the ContraryHubbard, Raymond et al. | 2019
- 36
-
Correcting Corrupt Research: Recommendations for the Profession to Stop Misuse of p-ValuesKmetz, John L. et al. | 2019
- 46
-
Quality Control for Scientific Research: Addressing Reproducibility, Responsiveness, and RelevanceHubbard, Douglas W. / Carriquiry, Alicia L. et al. | 2019
- 56
-
The Role of Expert Judgment in Statistical Inference and Evidence-Based Decision-MakingBrownstein, Naomi C. / Louis, Thomas A. / O’Hagan, Anthony / Pendergast, Jane et al. | 2019
- 69
-
Expert Knowledge Elicitation: Subjective but ScientificO’Hagan, Anthony et al. | 2019
- 82
-
Before p < 0.05 to Beyond p < 0.05: Using History to Contextualize p-Values and Significance TestingKennedy-Shaffer, Lee et al. | 2019
- 91
-
The Limited Role of Formal Statistical Inference in Scientific InferenceHubbard, Raymond / Haig, Brian D. / Parsa, Rahul A. et al. | 2019
- 99
-
Large-Scale Replication Projects in Contemporary Psychological ResearchMcShane, Blakeley B. / Tackett, Jennifer L. / Böckenholt, Ulf / Gelman, Andrew et al. | 2019
- 106
-
Valid P-Values Behave Exactly as They Should: Some Misleading Criticisms of P-Values and Their Resolution With S-ValuesGreenland, Sander et al. | 2019
- 115
-
The p-Value Requires Context, Not a ThresholdBetensky, Rebecca A. et al. | 2019
- 118
-
Assessing Statistical Results: Magnitude, Precision, and Model UncertaintyAnderson, Andrew A. et al. | 2019
- 122
-
Putting the P-Value in its PlaceKrueger, Joachim I. / Heck, Patrick R. et al. | 2019
- 129
-
Evidence From Marginally Significant t StatisticsJohnson, Valen E. et al. | 2019
- 135
-
The p-value Function and Statistical InferenceFraser, D. A. S. et al. | 2019
- 148
-
p-Values, Bayes Factors, and SufficiencyRougier, Jonathan et al. | 2019
- 152
-
Limitations of P-Values and R-squared for Stepwise Regression Building: A Fairness Demonstration in Health Policy Risk AdjustmentRose, Sherri / McGuire, Thomas G. et al. | 2019
- 157
-
An Introduction to Second-Generation p-ValuesBlume, Jeffrey D. / Greevy, Robert A. / Welty, Valerie F. / Smith, Jeffrey R. / Dupont, William D. et al. | 2019
- 168
-
A Proposed Hybrid Effect Size Plus p-Value Criterion: Empirical Evidence Supporting its UseGoodman, William M. / Spruill, Susan E. / Komaroff, Eugene et al. | 2019
- 186
-
Three Recommendations for Improving the Use of p-ValuesBenjamin, Daniel J. / Berger, James O. et al. | 2019
- 192
-
The False Positive Risk: A Proposal Concerning What to Do About p-ValuesColquhoun, David et al. | 2019
- 202
-
Moving Towards the Post p < 0.05 Era via the Analysis of CredibilityMatthews, Robert A. J. et al. | 2019
- 213
-
Blending Bayesian and Classical Tools to Define Optimal Sample-Size-Dependent Significance LevelsGannon, Mark Andrew / de Bragança Pereira, Carlos Alberto / Polpo, Adriano et al. | 2019
- 223
-
How Effect Size (Practical Significance) Misleads Clinical Practice: The Case for Switching to Practical Benefit to Assess Applied Research FindingsPogrow, Stanley et al. | 2019
- 235
-
Abandon Statistical SignificanceMcShane, Blakeley B. / Gal, David / Gelman, Andrew / Robert, Christian / Tackett, Jennifer L. et al. | 2019
- 246
-
Statistical Inference Enables Bad Science; Statistical Thinking Enables Good ScienceTong, Christopher et al. | 2019
- 262
-
Inferential Statistics as Descriptive Statistics: There Is No Replication Crisis if We Don’t Expect ReplicationAmrhein, Valentin / Trafimow, David / Greenland, Sander et al. | 2019
- 271
-
The New Statistics for Better Science: Ask How Much, How Uncertain, and What Else Is KnownCalin-Jageman, Robert J. / Cumming, Geoff et al. | 2019
- 281
-
How Large Are Your G-Values? Try Gosset’s Guinnessometrics When a Little “p” Is Not EnoughZiliak, Stephen T. et al. | 2019
- 291
-
Predictive Inference and Scientific ReproducibilityBillheimer, Dean et al. | 2019
- 296
-
Treatment Choice With Trial Data: Statistical Decision Theory Should Supplant Hypothesis TestingManski, Charles F. et al. | 2019
- 305
-
Trial Size for Near-Optimal Choice Between Surveillance and Aggressive Treatment: Reconsidering MSLT-IIManski, Charles F. / Tetenov, Aleksey et al. | 2019
- 312
-
Frequentist, Bayes, or Other?Lavine, Michael et al. | 2019
- 319
-
Inference and Decision Making for 21st-Century Drug Development and ApprovalRuberg, Stephen J. / Harrell, Frank E.Jr. / Gamalo-Siebers, Margaret / LaVange, Lisa / Jack Lee, J. / Price, Karen / Peck, Carl et al. | 2019
- 328
-
Multiple Perspectives on Inference for Two Simple Statistical Scenariosvan Dongen, Noah N. N. / van Doorn, Johnny B. / Gronau, Quentin F. / van Ravenzwaaij, Don / Hoekstra, Rink / Haucke, Matthias N. / Lakens, Daniel / Hennig, Christian / Morey, Richard D. / Homer, Saskia et al. | 2019
- 340
-
Five Nonobvious Changes in Editorial Practice for Editors and Reviewers to Consider When Evaluating Submissions in a Post p < 0.05 UniverseTrafimow, David et al. | 2019
- 346
-
The Impact of Results Blind Science Publishing on Statistical Consultation and CollaborationLocascio, Joseph J. et al. | 2019
- 352
-
Coup de Grâce for a Tough Old Bull: “Statistically Significant” ExpiresHurlbert, Stuart H. / Levine, Richard A. / Utts, Jessica et al. | 2019
- 358
-
The World of Research Has Gone Berserk: Modeling the Consequences of Requiring “Greater Statistical Stringency” for Scientific PublicationCampbell, Harlan / Gustafson, Paul et al. | 2019
- 374
-
Assessing the Statistical Analyses Used in Basic and Applied Social Psychology After Their p-Value BanFricker, Ronald D.Jr. / Burke, Katherine / Han, Xiaoyan / Woodall, William H. et al. | 2019
- 385
-
Content Audit for p-value Principles in Introductory StatisticsMaurer, Karsten / Hudiburgh, Lynette / Werwinski, Lisa / Bailer, John et al. | 2019
- 392
-
Beyond Calculations: A Course in Statistical ThinkingSteel, E. Ashley / Liermann, Martin / Guttorp, Peter et al. | 2019