From the theoretical to the practical: how to evaluate the ethical and scientific justifications of randomized clinical trials (Unknown)
- New search for: Olsen, Maria
- New search for: Sharp, Melissa K.
- New search for: Bossuyt, Patrick M.
- New search for: Olsen, Maria
- New search for: Sharp, Melissa K.
- New search for: Bossuyt, Patrick M.
In:
Journal of clinical epidemiology
;
99
;
170-171
;
2018
-
ISSN:
- Article (Journal) / Print
-
Title:From the theoretical to the practical: how to evaluate the ethical and scientific justifications of randomized clinical trials
-
Contributors:
-
Published in:Journal of clinical epidemiology ; 99 ; 170-171
-
Publisher:
- New search for: Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam.
-
Publication date:2018-01-01
-
Size:2 pages
-
ISSN:
-
Type of media:Article (Journal)
-
Type of material:Print
-
Language:Unknown
-
Source:
© Metadata Copyright the British Library Board and other contributors. All rights reserved.
Table of contents – Volume 99
The tables of contents are generated automatically and are based on the data records of the individual contributions available in the index of the TIB portal. The display of the Tables of Contents may therefore be incomplete.
- 1
-
Most response-inducing strategies do not increase participation in observational studies: a systematic review and meta-analysisvan Gelder, Marleen M.H.J. / Vlenterie, Richelle / IntHout, Joanna / Engelen, Lucien J.L.P.G. / Vrieling, Alina / van de Belt, Tom H. et al. | 2018
- 14
-
Systematic reviews do not adequately report or address missing outcome data in their analyses: a methodological surveyKahale, Lara A. / Diab, Batoul / Brignardello-Petersen, Romina / Agarwal, Arnav / Mustafa, Reem A. / Kwong, Joey / Neumann, Ignacio / Li, Ling / Lopes, Luciane Cruz / Briel, Matthias et al. | 2018
- 24
-
Quality assessment versus risk of bias in systematic reviews: AMSTAR and ROBIS had similar reliability but differed in their construct and applicabilityBanzi, Rita / Cinquini, Michela / Gonzalez-Lorenzo, Marien / Pecoraro, Valentina / Capobussi, Matteo / Minozzi, Silvia et al. | 2018
- 33
-
Do clinicians want recommendations? A multicenter study comparing evidence summaries with and without GRADE recommendationsNeumann, Ignacio / Alonso-Coello, Pablo / Vandvik, Per Olav / Agoritsas, Thomas / Mas, Gemma / Akl, Elie A. / Brignardello-Petersen, Romina / Emparanza, Jose / McCullagh, Lauren / De Sitio, Catherine et al. | 2018
- 41
-
Structured methodology review identified seven (RETREAT) criteria for selecting qualitative evidence synthesis approachesBooth, Andrew / Noyes, Jane / Flemming, Kate / Gerhardus, Ansgar / Wahlster, Philip / van der Wilt, Gert Jan / Mozygemba, Kati / Refolo, Pietro / Sacchini, Dario / Tummers, Marcia et al. | 2018
- 53
-
Systematic review identifies six metrics and one method for assessing literature search effectiveness but no consensus on appropriate useCooper, Chris / Varley-Campbell, Joanna / Booth, Andrew / Britten, Nicky / Garside, Ruth et al. | 2018
- 64
-
Network meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies identifies and ranks the optimal diagnostic tests and thresholds for health care policy and decision-makingOwen, Rhiannon K. / Cooper, Nicola J. / Quinn, Terence J. / Lees, Rosalind / Sutton, Alex J. et al. | 2018
- 75
-
An observational study showed that explaining randomization using gambling-related metaphors and computer-agency descriptions impeded randomized clinical trial recruitmentJepson, Marcus / Elliott, Daisy / Conefrey, Carmel / Wade, Julia / Rooshenas, Leila / Wilson, Caroline / Beard, David / Blazeby, Jane M. / Birtle, Alison / Halliday, Alison et al. | 2018
- 84
-
Association measures of claims-based algorithms for common chronic conditions were assessed using regularly collected data in JapanHara, Konan / Tomio, Jun / Svensson, Thomas / Ohkuma, Rika / Svensson, Akiko Kishi / Yamazaki, Tsutomu et al. | 2018
- 96
-
Lack of preregistered analysis plans allows unacceptable data mining for and selective reporting of consensus in Delphi studiesGrant, Sean / Booth, Marika / Khodyakov, Dmitry et al. | 2018
- 106
-
A review of cluster randomized trials found statistical evidence of selection biasBolzern, Jaime / Mnyama, Nandi / Bosanquet, Katharine / Torgerson, David J. et al. | 2018
- 113
-
Cross-cultural adaptation of Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire needs to assess the measurement properties: a systematic reviewYao, Min / Zhu, Sen / Tian, Zi-rui / Song, Yong-jia / Yang, Long / Wang, Yong-jun / Cui, Xue-jun et al. | 2018
- 123
-
PRISMA and AMSTAR show systematic reviews on health literacy and cancer screening are of good qualitySharma, Sakshi / Oremus, Mark et al. | 2018
- 132
-
High agreement was obtained across scores from multiple equated scales for social anxiety disorder using item response theorySunderland, Matthew / Batterham, Philip / Calear, Alison / Carragher, Natacha / Baillie, Andrew / Slade, Tim et al. | 2018
- 144
-
The M3 multimorbidity index outperformed both Charlson and Elixhauser indices when predicting adverse outcomes in people with diabetesGurney, Jason K. / Stanley, James / Sarfati, Diana et al. | 2018
- 153
-
Extraction of unadjusted estimates of prognostic association for meta-analysis: simulation methods as good alternatives to trend and direct method estimationPérez, T. / McLellan, J. / Perera, R. et al. | 2018
- 164
-
Pragmatic trials revisited: applicability is about individualizationSacristán, José A. / Dilla, Tatiana et al. | 2018
- 167
-
Preregistration and publication of nonregulated intervention trials are here to stay (letter commenting Wallach et al 2018, 93, 88-93)Dal-Ré, Rafael et al. | 2018
- 168
-
Technology-assisted risk of bias assessment in systematic reviews requires precise definitions of risk of biasPuljak, Livia et al. | 2018
- 169
-
Response to Dr. Livia Puljak's letter about our published articleGates, Allison / Vandermeer, Ben / Hartling, Lisa et al. | 2018
- 170
-
From the theoretical to the practical: how to evaluate the ethical and scientific justifications of randomized clinical trialsOlsen, Maria / Sharp, Melissa K. / Bossuyt, Patrick M. et al. | 2018
- 171
-
Reply to: Letter to the Editor by M. Olsen, M. K. Sharp, and P. M. BossuytShamy, Michel / Fedyk, Mark et al. | 2018
- iii
-
Table of Contents| 2018
- vi
-
The need for consensus on consensus methodsTugwell, Peter / Knottnerus, J. André et al. | 2018
-
Cover 2 Editorial Board| 2018