United States v. Smith (English)
In:
Harvard law review
;
129
, 8
; 1
;
2016
-
ISSN:
- Article (Journal) / Print
-
Title:United States v. Smith
-
Published in:Harvard law review ; 129, 8 ; 1
-
Publisher:
- New search for: Harvard Law Review Assoc.
-
Place of publication:Cambridge, Mass.
-
Publication date:2016
-
ISSN:
-
ZDBID:
-
Type of media:Article (Journal)
-
Type of material:Print
-
Language:English
- New search for: 86.10 / 86.00 / 86.10 / 86.00
- Further information on Basic classification
- New search for: jur 994 aa zc / jur 001 zc
-
Keywords:
-
Classification:
BKL: 86.10 Recht einzelner Länder, Gebiete und Völker / 86.00 Recht: Allgemeines / 86.10 / 86.00 Local classification FBR: jur 994 aa zc / jur 001 zc -
Source:
Table of contents – Volume 129, Issue 8
The tables of contents are generated automatically and are based on the data records of the individual contributions available in the index of the TIB portal. The display of the Tables of Contents may therefore be incomplete.
- 1
-
In re ChinaCast Education Corp. Securities Litigation| 2016
- 1
-
Major Question Objections| 2016
- 1
-
Chinese Common Law? Guiding Cases and Judicial Reform| 2016
- 1
-
In re Tam| 2016
- 1
-
Lu Junhong v. Boeing| 2016
- 1
-
Bauer v. Lynch| 2016
- 1
-
Bible v. United Student Aid Funds, Inc| 2016
- 1
-
Systemic Facts: Toward Institutional Awareness in Criminal CourtsAndrew Manuel Crespo et al. | 2016
- 1
-
Lenz v. Universal Music Corp| 2016
- 1
-
United States v. Smith| 2016
- 2118
-
Fixing Statutory InterpretationKavanaugh, Brett M. et al. | 2016
- 2164
-
Knowledge and Politics in International LawMoyn, Samuel et al. | 2016
- 2235
-
OSHA's Feasibility Policy: The Implications of the ``Infeasibility'' of Respirators| 2016
- 2257
-
Title VII — Sex Discrimination — Fourth Circuit Applies ``Unequal Burdens'' Analysis to Gender-Normed Fitness Test. — Bauer v. Lynch, 812 F.3d 340 (4th Cir.), reh'g en banc denied, No. 14-2323 (4th Cir. Mar. 8, 2016)| 2016
- 2265
-
First Amendment — Offense-Based Bar on Trademark Registration — Federal Circuit Holds the Lanham Act's Antidisparagement Provision Unconstitutional. — In re Tam, 808 F.3d 1321 (Fed. Cir. 2015) (en banc)| 2016
- 2273
-
Securities Law — Rule 10b-5 — Ninth Circuit Effectively Eliminates Adverse-Interest Exception as a Defense to Fraud-on-the-Market Claims. — In re ChinaCast Education Corp. Securities Litigation, 809 F.3d 471 (9th Cir. 2015)| 2016
- 2281
-
Administrative Law — Auer Deference — Seventh Circuit Defers to Department of Education Amicus Brief Interpreting Student Loan Regulations. — Bible v. United Student Aid Funds, Inc., 799 F.3d 633 (7th Cir.), reh'g denied, 807 F.3d 839 (7th Cir. 2015), cert. denied, 2016 WL 2842875 (U.S. May 16, 2016)| 2016
- 2289
-
Copyright Law — Digital Millennium Copyright Act — Ninth Circuit Requires Analysis of Fair Use Before Issuing of Takedown Notices. — Lenz. v. Universal Music Corp., No. 13-16106, 2016 WL 1056082 (9th Cir. Mar. 17, 2016), reh'g en banc denied, id| 2016
- 2297
-
Criminal Law — Controlled Substances Act — District Court Denies Oxycodone Distributor's Post-trial Motions in Penalty-Enhancement Case. — United States v. Smith, No. 6:13-34-KKC, 2015 WL 4458891 (E.D. Ky. July 21, 2015)| 2016
- 2305
-
Admiralty Law — Removal — Seventh Circuit Holds that 2011 Amendment to 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Permits Removal Based Solely on Admiralty Jurisdiction. — Lu Junhong v. Boeing, 792 F.3d 805 (7th Cir.), reh'g en banc denied, No. 14-1825 (7th Cir. Aug. 10, 2015)| 2016