Current status of quality control in screening esophagogastroduodenoscopy and the emerging role of artificial intelligence (English)
- New search for: Zhang, Lihui
- New search for: Yao, Liwen
- New search for: Lu, Zihua
- New search for: Yu, Honggang
- New search for: Zhang, Lihui
- New search for: Yao, Liwen
- New search for: Lu, Zihua
- New search for: Yu, Honggang
In:
Digestive Endoscopy
;
36
, 1
;
5-15
;
2024
- Article (Journal) / Electronic Resource
-
Title:Current status of quality control in screening esophagogastroduodenoscopy and the emerging role of artificial intelligence
-
Contributors:
-
Published in:Digestive Endoscopy ; 36, 1 ; 5-15
-
Publisher:
-
Publication date:2024-01-01
-
Size:15 pages
-
ISSN:
-
DOI:
-
Type of media:Article (Journal)
-
Type of material:Electronic Resource
-
Language:English
-
Keywords:
-
Source:
Table of contents – Volume 36, Issue 1
The tables of contents are generated automatically and are based on the data records of the individual contributions available in the index of the TIB portal. The display of the Tables of Contents may therefore be incomplete.
- 1
-
Cover Image| 2024
- 2
-
Issue Information| 2024
- 5
-
Current status of quality control in screening esophagogastroduodenoscopy and the emerging role of artificial intelligenceZhang, Lihui / Yao, Liwen / Lu, Zihua / Yu, Honggang et al. | 2024
- 16
-
Quality indicators in endoscopic screening and the role of artificial intelligenceOkamoto, Takeshi / Hirasawa, Toshiaki et al. | 2024
- 19
-
Novel quantitative assessment indicators for efficiency and precision of endoscopic submucosal dissection in animal training models by analyzing an electrical surgical unitMasunaga, Teppei / Kato, Motohiko / Sasaki, Motoki / Iwata, Kentaro / Miyazaki, Kurato / Kubosawa, Yoko / Mizutani, Mari / Takatori, Yusaku / Matsuura, Noriko / Nakayama, Atsushi et al. | 2024
- 28
-
Objective indicators of endoscopic submucosal dissection skills through electrosurgical unit analysisMitsui, Tomohiro / Yoda, Yusuke et al. | 2024
- 30
-
What are the priority quality indicators for colonoscopy in real‐world clinical practice?Tiankanon, Kasenee / Aniwan, Satimai et al. | 2024
- 40
-
Impact of an artificial intelligence‐aided endoscopic diagnosis system on improving endoscopy quality for trainees in colonoscopy: Prospective, randomized, multicenter studyYamaguchi, Daisuke / Shimoda, Ryo / Miyahara, Koichi / Yukimoto, Takahiro / Sakata, Yasuhisa / Takamori, Ayako / Mizuta, Yumi / Fujimura, Yutaro / Inoue, Suma / Tomonaga, Michito et al. | 2024
- 49
-
Computer‐aided detection in colonoscopic practice: Ready for prime time?Togashi, Kazutomo et al. | 2024
- 51
-
Endoscopist‐related factors affecting adenoma detection during colonoscopy: Data from the J‐SCOUT studyKawamura, Takuji / Sekiguchi, Masau / Takamaru, Hiroyuki / Mizuguchi, Yasuhiko / Horiguchi, Go / Toyoizumi, Hirobumi / Kato, Masayuki / Kobayashi, Kiyonori / Sada, Miwa / Oda, Yasushi et al. | 2024
- 59
-
Impact and assessment of training models in interventional endoscopic ultrasoundMiutescu, Bogdan / Dhir, Vinay et al. | 2024
- 74
-
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography training and educationChen, Jiann‐Hwa / Wang, Hsiu‐Po et al. | 2024
- 86
-
Know endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and yourself, then you need not fear the result of a hundred casesMizuno, Suguru / Mochida, Satoshi et al. | 2024
- 89
-
How to implement adverse events as a quality indicator in gastrointestinal endoscopyMoreels, Tom G. et al. | 2024
- 97
-
Empowering African endoscopy through Indian initiative| 2024